Constitutional Law

The Rights of Pregnant Women and A visibly pregnant Delilah Jones consult that she was going to fuddle her baby to termination . While Jones master to manipulation intoxicant to induce an abortion or a the birth of a stillborn child may be incorruptisticly repugnant to most people , a round of flake right environ abortion and women s reproductive rights indicates that she was inwardly her built-in rights to make this decision . Although the Supreme courtyard has not control specifically on the Wisconsin law , it appears that any law which restricts the use of alcohol and separate substances by pregnant women may be unconstitutionalAs noted in Maher v . hard roe (1977 ) the state has a strong and legitimate interest in ascending normal childbearing From an ethical or moral vista , the State s interest in encouraging normal childbearing which by extension includes an interest in encouraging women to require to healthy pregnancies , is deeply rooted in the history of western civilization . In addition to these historic ethical and moral considerations in preserving the health of an unborn child , the State in any case has a compelling economic interest in treasure the health of a fetus . The cost of caring for a child born with fetal alcohol syndrome drug addictions , and other(a) complications that be related to the dumbfound s communicate during pregnancy roll in the hay be very high and may commit an idle burden on healthc are systems , education systems , and complaisant operate . In many cases , these complications may contribute womb-to-tomb implications that take aim ongoing care and additional servicesThese ethical and economic interests in healthy pregnancies have led roughly States to pass laws regarding the conduct of women during pregnancy and excessi ve consumption of alcohol or other forms of ! substance abuse (Wisconsin Statute 48 .02 ,. 3 .

in time , while laws protecting a fetus from the harmful behaviors of the mother may be intended , a review of germane(predicate) case law indicates that such laws are ultimately unconstitutional and are a violation of the cleaning woman s constitutional rightsIn Roe v . Wade (1973 , the Supreme courtyard ruled that a woman has the right to terminate a pregnancy . Since the Court s ruling in Roe , some(prenominal) attempts have been do to restrict the right to terminate a pregnancy or to prescribe the panache in which a pregnancy may be terminated . In Stenberg v . Carhart (2000 , the Court ruled that laws restricting the use of one of these restrictions , a procedure referred to as partial birth abortion , were unconstitutional . Stenberg affirms the Court s amoral attitude towards abortion which was noted earlier in Maher , that abortion and childbirth , when stripped of the sensitive moral arguments surrounding the abortion careen , are simply two option medical methods of transaction with pregnancy In Stenberg , the Court appeared to be saying that women have a wide choice when selecting the manner in which they volition terminate their pregnancies , including choices that other people cogency find virtuously repugnant . When Jones announced that she was going to drink this baby to death , she was simply...If you want to get a respectable essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay