Supreme Court Exercise

In January of 1997 , the standing chair , William Jefferson Clinton sued a adult womanish named Paula Corbin Jones . Jones had claimed that the professorship , while governor , had made unwanted , and then , salacious sexual advances toward her and that her refusal to comply with Clinton s wishes had resulted in hardship at excogitate for her (USSC , 1997 . Jones claimed she had been working at the front desk of a hotel with a nonher woman , when Clinton arrived for a visit . She and a co-worker had chatted with Clinton s accompaniment for a few moments . Clinton , observing the br conversation , remarked to his date that Jones had a come hither look , and he instructed Ferguson to make for Jones up to talk to him . Jones testified that she had joined Clinton in his room , hoping for a contemplate promotion . Clinton inste ad made sexual advances toward her , which she repeatedly refused . Jones claimed that Clinton had then(prenominal) told her to be smart and non make trouble , because he knew her boss (AP , 1998Clinton , rather than responding to these charges , d a motion to chivy the charges , citing hot seatial claim . Clinton s truthyer Robert Bennett claimed that Jones would non lose twain rights if her claim was postponed , and that , indeed , she might earn interest on any damages she was awarded (Johnston , 1994 . A district judge denied Clinton s tuck up for dismissal , but govern that investigatings and trials into Clinton s behavior could be deferred until later his term as President was up (USSC , 1997The eightsome zone Court of Appeals likewise ruled that Clinton s motion for belowground ought non be granted , but it found that deferring the investigation gave Clinton fugitive immunity that he was not entirely authorize to . The approach reasoned that the pres ident was not above the law , rather , he wa! s subject to the same rules as cut-and-dried citizens . turn the president was allowed immunity from charges against his official acts , he could lock away , state the administration , be held accountable for unofficial acts . His cliquish comport , according to the Eigth District Court , could be held down the stairs interrogatory (USSC , 1997The court , in Clinton v . Jones addressed several(prenominal) constituent(a) questions , but dismissed two . One was whether or not a similar claim to Clinton s would be flourishing on the state level . The arcsecond was whether or not the court had the power to demand the president s presence at any time . The court did address three constitutional questions , so far . The initiatory was whether or not the president had the right to immunity in affairs not cogitate to his official clientele . The court did not find it essential to answer the first two questions , but did find that the president s immunity did not extend to hi s private conduct (USSC , 1997 The second was whether or not the court finding that the president did not have immunity in such cases violated the insularity of powers . The court ruled that it did not . The third was whether or not the court , by submitting Clinton to investigations , might...If you want to get a full(a) essay, order it on our website: BestEssayCheap.com

If you want to get a full essay, visit our page: cheap essay